Massive Web Traffic Fraud: Digital Advertising Confronts “Crisis”

Digital media, and specifically display advertising, is facing a “crisis” even as brand marketers are increasingly serious about shifting budgets online and into mobile. That phrase, “crisis,” comes directly from the chair of the IAB, Vivek Shah, as quoted in the Wall Street Journal.

The WSJ article cites IAB estimates that suggest more than a third of all online traffic is fake or fraudulent:

About 36 percent of all Web traffic is considered fake, the product of computers hijacked by viruses and programmed to visit sites, according to estimates cited recently by the Interactive Advertising Bureau trade group.

Nearly 30 percent of all US advertising is now digital and, increasingly, it’s bought through automated platforms and systems. Even as its popularity is growing rapidly, automated or programmatic ad buying is a contributor to the problems identified in the article: lack of transparency and accountability being chief among them.

Others in the past have estimated that a substantial amount of web traffic is “suspicious.” Solve Media argues the number may be more than 40 percent. Earlier, a comScore study found 31 percent of display ads are never seen by their intended audiences.

The latter comScore data don’t represent fraud per se. However they reflect instances when ads aren’t seen by their intended audiences for one reason or another — amounting to the same outcome essentially.

All of these problems cast a shadow over online and mobile advertising and automated ad buying in particular. Yet, as the WSJ article points out, heavy consumer usage of the internet means that marketers cannot avoid shifting budgets to where their audiences are.

New metrics such as “viewability” are being implemented to restore confidence in display. In addition more third parties are getting involved as auditors or to root out fraud where it may be happening. Advertisers themselves are increasingly demanding reimbursements and “make goods” where fraud is detected. As the WSJ reports:

Advertisers hope that demanding make-good ads will pressure ad exchanges and ad networks to ensure that their inventories are properly vetted.

Marketers also keep lists of sites that have fraudulent traffic and ask that when the free ads are given, they be placed on high-quality sites, which have low rates of fraud.

Clearly it’s in all parties’ interests — marketers, agencies, publishers, exchanges — to work together to strengthen and fortify the integrity of the system.

Related Topics: Channel: Display Advertising | Statistics: Online Advertising | Top News

Sponsored


About The Author: is a Contributing Editor at Search Engine Land. He writes a personal blog Screenwerk, about SoLoMo issues and connecting the dots between online and offline. He also posts at Internet2Go, which is focused on the mobile Internet. Follow him @gsterling.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn



Marketing Day:

Get the top marketing stories daily!  

Share

Other ways to share:
 

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • PMDigital1

    While 30% of the clicks are not real, they are not
    necessarily all fraudulent. What these fake clicks are caused by are the bots that
    crawl sites for various reasons; these bots are counted as impressions, and ads
    are subsequently served because they look like a user on the site. For example,
    PM Digital partakes in bots itself, which in turn, count as impressions. The
    agency runs a proprietary link checker that checks all of our clients’ links
    for 2 things: 1) error 404 pages, 2) out of stock language. We check out
    clients’ links every day and send results of bad pages and out of stock
    language to immediately update and optimize. I would not consider those clicks “fraudulent” but it is true that they are served display impressions that nobody actually
    sees.
    A consolidated move toward viewable impressions would knock
    out these erroneous clicks, and streamline the ad buying system.
    -Suzy Sandberg
    President of Global Media, PM Digital

  • http://www.brand.com/blog James R. Halloran

    I honestly don’t think “viewability” should be what they’re after. Conversions should always be the end result. In fact, Google teamed up with Spider.io in order to combat this problem of ad bots exactly.

    It’ll be nice to see what they do with it in the near future!

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Marketing Land on Twitter @marketingland Like Marketing Land on Facebook Follow Marketing Land on Google+ Subscribe to Our Feed! Join our LinkedIn Group Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest

 
 

Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States

Europe

Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech


Free Daily Marketing News!

Marketing Day is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!