Facebook Sued Under Federal Wiretapping Law For Mining Private Messages

online privacyFacebook faces a potential class action lawsuit (“Matthew Campbell v. Facebook Inc.”) for allegedly violating the US Electronic Communications Privacy Act and California privacy and unfair competition laws. At issue is the company’s alleged practice of scanning private Facebook messages (first discovered in 2012) for URLs and then using that information as part of its ad targeting data.

Reportedly it treats the presence of the URL in a private message as a Like of that publisher or content.

The complaint essentially argues:

  1. Facebook’s statements to users creates expectations of privacy in its private messaging
  2. In contrast to those representations “Facebook messages are systematically intercepted” and mined for URLs
  3. This data mining is done without user knowledge or consent
  4. Users are likely to share things in private Facebook messages that they wouldn’t otherwise disclose or share publicly on Facebook
  5. The data collected (URLs) are shared with third parties for ad-targeting purposes

The federal Electronic Communications Privacy Act is an anti-wiretapping statute, with numerous exceptions, first passed in 1986 and amended several times since then. Google faces similar allegations and litigation for scanning the contents of Gmail.

Facebook indicated in formal statements that it believes the lawsuit is “without merit” and plans to “vigorously” contest it. It’s not clear whether the alleged private message scanning implicates the company’s consent decree with the US FTC and thus whether the regulatory agency will become involved.

From a review of news coverage in October 2012 Facebook appears to acknowledge scanning private messages. That doesn’t automatically mean however that the plaintiffs will succeed in their litigation.

The complaint seeks to stop the identified practices. It also asks for attorney fees and damages on behalf of each class member, defined as all Facebook users who “have sent or received private Facebook messages that included a URL.” Facebook has roughly 200 million “monthly active users” in the US. It’s not clear to me how many fall into the category of people sending URLs in private messages.

Regardless, under formulas provided in the various statutes plead in the complaint, monetary damages easily run into the many billions of dollars.

Related Topics: Channel: Social Media Marketing | Facebook | Facebook: Advertising | Facebook: Legal | Facebook: Privacy | Top News


About The Author: is a Contributing Editor at Search Engine Land. He writes a personal blog Screenwerk, about SoLoMo issues and connecting the dots between online and offline. He also posts at Internet2Go, which is focused on the mobile Internet. Follow him @gsterling.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn

Marketing Day:

Get the top marketing stories daily!  


Other ways to share:

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • Sam Mazaheri

    I think #4 “Users are likely to share things in private Facebook messages that they wouldn’t otherwise disclose or share publicly on Facebook” is a good point. This is much more invasive than Gmail’s ads since Facebook ads follow you outside of the messaging application. Could make for some pretty embarrassing ad impressions.

  • http://www.bespokesoftwaredevelopment.com/ Bespoke Software Expert – Jon

    I thought the word ‘Private’ means private….not sure what English dictionary is FB referring to.

    I work for a software development company http://www.bespokesoftwaredevelopment.com and we have seen some pretty bad examples and complacency on security from quite a few large organizations! I hope FB looses this case and its a win for Joe public.

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Marketing Land on Twitter @marketingland Like Marketing Land on Facebook Follow Marketing Land on Google+ Subscribe to Our Feed! Join our LinkedIn Group Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest


Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States


Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech

Free Daily Marketing News!

Marketing Day is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!