Goodbye Memes, Hello Quality Articles & News: What Facebook’s News Feed Changes Mean For Admins

Yesterday, Facebook announced changes to the News Feed that will show related articles, posts with recent comments, and better quality news and articles. While the related articles piece and comment highlighting may have garnered the most attention in the update, they weren’t the most important change.

The biggest element of the announcement for marketers is the fact that Facebook will now be putting “More relevant articles in the feed.” This means that Facebook users will see more, well, news in their News Feed and fewer images and memes. This comes as a complete 180 to much of the image marketing posts that were highly touted just last year.

This Has Been In The Works For Awhile Now

In case you haven’t been following Facebook’s changes that closely, a big change came 3.5 months ago when they added more prominence to the way that Link posts were displayed in the  News Feed. The change was a significant one that helped to put link posts on par visually with image posts.

Before the September update (since the launch of Timeline), image posts had a much greater display size when displaying in the News Feed. This led to an influx of image marketing by Page Admins that wanted more real estate and visibility in the Feed; they would simply show an image with the link in the description.

The image with linked description was clearly poor form and something that Facebook needed to fix. Instead of actually showing the structured signal (link to article of importance) the signal was an images with the article shoehorned in via the description. Earlier this year we highlighted the importance of image optimization for link posts and how Facebook has gradually been allocating more and more space for Link posts. Well, in September, Link Posts hit the tipping point as they took up equal space to Image Posts.

Yesterday Facebook officially pushed link posts beyond tipping point and into the “best practice” realm.

If You Haven’t Changed Your Ways Yet, It’s Time To Start

Many marketers took heed and made the switch from Image-based posting to Link Posting when the link change in September occurred. If you haven’t made the switch from properly using link posts for articles, here are some reasons why to start:

Image-vs-Link-Post

  • Facebook Has Been “All-In” On Becoming A News Source A recent study showed that 1-in-3 Americans now use Facebook for a News Source. This is a big boon for Facebook, as they have not only become the go-to source for friend-to-friend updates, but also for providing accurate, custom news. In yesterday’s release Facebook proudly stated that referral traffic from Facebook to media sites has increase of 170% over the past year. Facebook wants to be the source for informative, pertinent news that users don’t need to sift through. Link posts are a quantifiable, structured format that will help Facebook continue to own this space, Image posts are not. An additional benefit of link posts is that a “more from” box with related articles from the site in question and related sites will now be showing.
  • This Will Be Occurring Even More For Mobile Users In the release Facebook states the following: “we’re now paying closer attention to what makes for high quality content, and how often articles are clicked on from News Feed on mobile. What this means is that you may start to notice links to articles a little more often (particularly on mobile).”  As you may remember from the most recent earnings call, Facebook’s mobile user base jumped 45%year-over-year. As mobile growth continues, optimizing articles for mobile devices will only behoove marketers.
  • Facebook Blatantly States That Less Images & More High Quality Articles Will Be Shown The final reason why you should use Link Posts for all articles isn’t scientific, it’s because Facebook implicitly states it. The quote from Facebook is:

    “ This means that high quality articles you or others read may show up a bit more prominently in your News Feed, and meme photos may show up a bit less prominently.”

Ladies and Gentleman, Link Posts and News/Articles are here to stay on the Feed. There are still valid reasons to share images (when image sharing is the goal) but you’ll miss out on the new attributes that the News Feed change offers.

Marketers Can No Longer Simply Push Links

One last takeaway is that if you are only providing a simple story share on Facebook, you are not doing your due diligence as a marketer. With Link Posts and the ability to see comments, shares and clicks, getting users engaged is now essential. Adding context around your article links that can entice users to take an action is critical. Examples provided showed The Atlantic pulling quotes and creating mini-articles to surround the baked-in title/description:

Facebook admins should now entice clicks/comments/shares by framing links with additional content now more than ever.

Is This A Good Thing For Users?

On the surface, I think this News & Link focus will be beneficial for users as long as it doesn’t overtake and water-down the person-to-person updates. While Grumpy Cat, Scumbag Steve and someecards give users a laugh, providing custom tailored news provides value. It should also be noted that Facebook is in a unique position where they can provide custom-tailored news in a way that no other source can at this moment.

With these changes expect to see more people across the globe looking to Facebook as a source of quality content and news, and look for Marketers & Brands to continue pushing ad dollars that direction as long as users stay engaged.

For more information on this update see our coverage from yesterday and the official release from Facebook.

Related Topics: Channel: Social Media Marketing | Facebook | Facebook: News Feed | Top News

Sponsored


About The Author: is the Director of Marketing for Cypress North, a company that specializes in social media and search marketing services and web-based application development. He has been in the Internet marketing industry for 6+ years and specializes in Social Media Marketing. You can also find Greg on Twitter (@gregfinn) or LinkedIn.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn



Marketing Day:

Get the top marketing stories daily!  

Share

Other ways to share:
 

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • http://www.thomadaneau.com/ Thoma Daneau

    Anyone can guess what it means for “non-media” page? Pages that only want to keep engagement with the fans, not get fans to click a link.

  • http://www.brickmarketing.com/ Nick Stamoulis

    I wonder if Facebook is pushing this so they can compete with Twitter as a news source. I use Facebook to keep tabs on friends and family and I turn to Twitter for the headlines. Maybe by pulling some of the photo posts Facebook will open room for news and updates and pull more users in.

  • Greg Finn

    Thoma,

    Testing will be your best friend. I would suggest not linking out to really thin stuff (like their specific comment about meme-sites) and keeping on with the image posts. I’d test out working to have posts with goals of getting likes and others with goals of getting comments and see what works for you!

  • Annie Lynsen

    I haven’t actually noticed a switch from the old-style link display to new. I wonder if they’re still rolling it out? For me, images still get much more prominence in my feed.

  • http://icel.me/ Icel

    As long as you can’t share what a person writes on a link, we will keep using images.

  • Jane

    “Starting soon, we’ll be doing a better job of distinguishing between a high quality article on a website versus a meme photo hosted somewhere other than Facebook” — The phrase “hosted somewhere other than Facebook” suggests that they’re more concerned with lowering the frequency of posts that link to outside sites with meme-like content — not necessarily that they’ll be serving image posts less frequently (i.e., images hosted on Facebook). Any thoughts/clarification on this?

  • Leslie

    I don’t go to Facebook for news..ever. I go to Facebook to see what my friends are doing, laugh at cute kittens and funny jokes. Not news. Really? News?

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Marketing Land on Twitter @marketingland Like Marketing Land on Facebook Follow Marketing Land on Google+ Subscribe to Our Feed! Join our LinkedIn Group Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest

 
 

Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States

Europe

Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech


Free Daily Marketing News!

Marketing Day is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!