• http://www.brickmarketing.com/ Nick Stamoulis

    The CDC did a great tie-in with zombies as well. Even government organizations can be cool and fun! It goes to show that your industry is only as “boring” as you want it to be. Provided you think a little outside the box (and you don’t even have to go that far) you can really get the attention of your audience.

  • http://twitter.com/ArnieK Arnie Kuenn

    I forgot about that one, but it is another great example.

  • https://plus.google.com/u/0/107418054739711167675 Rand Wilson

    All very great tips!
    I run an online-community with about 90% user-generated and I do/have done almost all of these. It would be very difficult to create all of that content, or even a tiny percentage of it, myself.

  • http://www.webmaisterpro.com/ Kaloyan Banev

    It sounds easier than it is. I am running several membership websites, forums and social networks. It takes a lot of time to get quality user generated content and unfortunately the first to arrive is spammy and low quality content.

  • http://twitter.com/ArnieK Arnie Kuenn

    Thanks Rand. And congrats, it’s not easy to achieve that level of UGC. You are def doing something right!

  • http://twitter.com/ArnieK Arnie Kuenn

    I agree. It can be a lot of work. Especially if you are running several websites. And yes, spam is just a reality. Everyone is looking for the “easy button” online. And I sure haven’t found one.

  • سواتر ومظلات المديميغ

    If at first you don’t succeed, get negative once again, seems to be the game plan at Microsoft. Having attacked Google Shopping with a “Scroogled” campaign last
    November, Microsoft is back again. This time it goes after Gmail as an
    evil service that invades your email privacy, armed with polling data
    showing consumer concern — and perhaps one valid point about an easier

    The Microsoft Survey & Consumer Disapproval

    Microsoft commissioned a survey of over 1,006 adults in the US from
    Feb. 1-4, asking about email services that target ads based on the
    content of your email. You know. Google’s Gmail, which is the only major
    service that does this, though Google or Gmail weren’t supposedly
    named. The results:

    70% of Americans didn’t believe or didn’t know whether any major
    email service provider scanned the content of personal emails in order
    to target ads

    83% of Americans agree that email service providers scanning the
    content of your personal emails to target ads is an invasion of privacy

    88% of Americans disapprove of email service providers scanning the
    content of your personal emails in order to target ads (and 52%
    disapprove strongly)

    88% of email users believe that email service providers should allow
    users to “opt-out” if they prefer that the content of their emails not
    be scanned in order to target ad

    89% of Americans agree that email service providers should not be
    allowed to scan the content of personal emails in order to target ads

    In short, pick your question, there’s a lot of disapproval supposedly
    about what Gmail does, which is to show ads based on the content of an
    email that you’re reading.

    Of course, some of the answers are contradictory. How is it that
    email users can both believe that emails shouldn’t be scanned for ad
    targeting purposes AND also think there should be an opt-out, at
    practically the same high percentage? If so many agree there should be
    an opt-out, then when you think about it, they’re not opposed that type
    of targeting as long as an opt-out is provided.

    Scroogle Gets Outed Early

    I’m still waiting for the actual questions that were asked; plus, the Scroogled site itself has yet to be updated to reflect the latest campaign. This is because it was supposed to go live at 11pm PT.

    Postscript: The actual poll is now up here.

    Microsoft had been briefing reporters about it, including myself.
    However, Dan Lyons over at ReadWrite who wasn’t briefed — and thus not
    subject to an embargo restriction — got some of the details and wrote them up. Embargo lifted, I was told, when I asked Microsoft — which is no doubt now scrambling to finish the site.

    This screenshot above is part of what will appear on the site:

    There will also be newspapers ads, such as this one below:

    Fair? Not Really, Though Opt-Out Could Be Better

    Is the campaign fair? I’d say mostly no, but there are some things that Google could do to improve things.

    Microsoft suggests that there is no way to opt-out of Gmail showing you ads targeted to your email content. Not true. There are several ways,
    ranging from using the HTML version of Gmail, to using an email program
    (such as Mail on the iPhone or Microsoft’s own Outlook software), to
    the $50 per year Google Apps service that allows anyone to opt-out.

    When I put this to Stefan Weitz, director of Microsoft’s Bing search
    engine (and apparently co-opted by Microsoft to speak on all things
    Scroogled), the response was that these options aren’t simple.

    “There’s no easy way to opt out,” Weitz told me. ”These are not ways that the average consumer is going to know”

    The Google Apps Opt-Out Isn’t Easy

    That, I agree with. As a Google Apps user myself, I would never wish
    the horror of having to become an administrator for a wide-range of
    Google services, which is what Google Apps requires, if all you want to
    do is opt-out of ads. HTML mail is an option, but do most Gmail users
    know to do this?

    Microsoft, of course, has ads in Outlook.com. It even has ads that
    are personalized based on your age, zip code and gender. I’m pretty sure
    if you asked consumers a question of whether ads should be targeted at
    them that way, you’d get a high percentage saying no.

    How About A $20 Per Year Gmail Opt-Out, Like Outlook?

    But, if you know where to look,
    you can switch those ads off for $20 per year at Outlook (though when I
    tried, I kept getting a error demanding I have a Windows Live ID, even
    though I was already signed-in. Perhaps, though, this might be because I
    already have an ad-free Outlook account).

    A smart move by Google would be to do the same. Offer the ability to
    turn off ads right within Gmail for $20 per year. Then, if people really
    are as concerned as the polling data suggests, they have an easy

    If People Want Privacy, How About Bing’s Personalized Search?

    Polling data is funny stuff, though. Recall that last year, Pew conducted a poll that found 73% of people felt personalized search was an invasion of their privacy.
    And yet, by default, Bing (like Google), personalizes search. If
    Microsoft really believes that Google should drop Gmail ad targeting
    based on its polling data, it’s pretty easy to say that Bing ought to
    stop doing personalized search.

    Why Attack Gmail Now?

    The ad campaign also felt odd to me because way back when Gmail launched in 2004,
    there was a huge amount of media attention to the idea of how the ads
    were targeted. Why does Microsoft suddenly believe this is an issue
    nearly 10 years later? Surely it was clearly accepted by consumers back
    at that time, who probably did hear about some of the targeting.

    “Even after a solid decade of the practice, people still don’t
    understand it, and when they do, they don’t like it,” Weitz said, citing
    the survey. He also said that it’s a good distinguishing point between
    Gmail and Microsoft’s recently launched Outlook.com email service.

    Reading Email For Security Deemed OK

    Another issue is that Microsoft, like Google, “reads” your email in
    an automated fashion (neither have humans that are doing this).
    Microsoft does it in order to help filter out spam and phishing attacks.
    This is also one of the reasons Google does it. So why is that reading

    Weitz said that for security, scanning like this makes sense. It’s
    the scanning for contextual targeting of ads that Microsoft objects to,
    based on the fact, Weitz said, that consumers seem to object to it.

    Microsoft Wants A Google Opt-Out

    And what does Microsoft want Google to do?

    “We’re calling on them to do some kind of change behalf of
    consumers,” Weitz said — in particular saying an easy opt-out should be
    provided, even if that’s a paid option.

    Google Says All’s Fine

    I guess we’ll see. When asked by another reporter that was briefed on
    this how Google might react, I said Google would likely mostly ignore
    the campaign. So far, that’s pretty much the case. When I asked for any
    comment, Google sent this statement that all media outlets are getting:

    Advertising keeps Google and many of the websites and
    services Google offers free of charge. We work hard to make sure that
    ads are safe, unobtrusive and relevant. No humans read your email or
    Google Account information in order to show you advertisements or
    related information. An automated algorithm — similar to that used for
    features like Priority Inbox or spam filtering — determines which ads
    are shown.

    In general, the Microsoft campaign leaves me cold, given how negative
    it is. Personally, what might get me to switch from Gmail to Outlook
    would be if Outlook had IMAP support. How about some of this negative
    energy going into making that type of improvement and others to pull
    consumers over.

    But, it would be nice to see Google provide an easy way to opt-out by
    paying right within Gmail. That would pretty much defuse any further
    Microsoft attacks. But even if not, I suspect despite what Microsoft’s
    poll says, most consumers on Gmail are going to stay there.

    Related Articles

    Microsoft Slams Google Privacy Changes With “Putting People First” Ad Campaign

    No, You Don’t Need To Fear The Google Privacy Changes: A Reality Check

    Bing Attacks Google Shopping With “Scroogled” Campaign, Forgets It’s Guilty Of Same Problems

    Bing Shopping As A Poster Child For Consumer Confusion About Ads

    Microsoft To Make Same Privacy Change Google Was Attacked For; No One Seems To Care

    EU Takes 10 Days To Question Google Privacy Change; After Two Months, Finally Looks At Microsoft’s

    Pew Report: 65% View Personalized Search As Bad; 73% See It As Privacy Invasion

    Related Topics: Featured | Features & Analysis | Google: Business Issues | Google: Critics | Google: Gmail | Legal: Privacy | Microsoft: Business Issues | Microsoft: Outlook | Top News

    About The Author: Danny Sullivan is Founding Editor of Marketing Land. He’s a widely cited
    authority on search marketing and internet marketing issues, who has
    covered the space since 1996. Danny also serves as Chief Content Officer
    for Third Door Media, which publishes Search Engine Land and produces the SMX: Search Marketing Expo conference series. He has a personal blog called Daggle (and keeps his disclosures page there). He can be found on Facebook, Google + and microblogs on Twitter as @dannysullivan. See more articles by Danny Sullivan

    Connect with the author via:

    | Twitter
    | Google+
    | LinkedIn

    Marketing Day: Get the top marketing stories daily!

    Like This Story? Please Share!



    Other ways to share:

    Like Our Site? Follow Us!

    Read before commenting! We welcome constructive
    comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means
    being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful
    information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving
    links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments
    using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise
    violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will
    be deleted. You can read more about our comments policy here.

    Top News




    Why I’m Glad Google Play Gives Developers Customer Data

    From Twitter, To Bing & Google: The State Of The Union Goes Social

    Half Of Google’s Search Traffic Comes From Partners

    Microsoft Attacks Gmail Over Privacy In Latest “Scroogled” Campaign

    Sorry, Google+ Users, Those Super Bowl Hashtags Really Were For Twitter

    See More Features

    New Animated AdSense Format Showcases Ad Headlines








    Get Our News, Everywhere!

    Daily Email:

    Got a tip? Tell us here!




    Our Stories Being Liked on Facebook

    Marketing Land Sponsors

    Advertise With Us

    Attend Our Internet Marketing Conferences

    Learn a lot from reading Marketing Land and Search Engine Land? Attend our conferences!

    Our SMX events
    deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences
    for internet marketers, whether you’re a seasoned expert or just
    starting out.

    Join us at an upcoming SMX event:

    SMX West – March 11-13, 2013

    SMX Toronto – March 20-21, 2013

    SMX Sydney – April 3-4, 2013

    SMX Munich – April 9-10, 2013
    SMX London – May 15-16, 2013

    SMX Paris – June 6-7 2013

    SMX Advanced – June 11-12, 2013

    Search Engine Land Webcasts, Whitepapers

    Learn more about internet and search marketing with our free webinars, whitepapers and research reports at Digital Marketing Depot.


    Helping Performance Marketers Assess the Value of Prospecting – Feb 26

    What is the economic impact of SEM services? Is it worth it? – Feb 28

    Google’s SSL enhancement: How does it impact your SEO? – Feb 5

    B2B Marketing Automation Tools 2013: The Marketer’s Guide

    Digital Agencies 2013: A Buyer’s Guide

    Enterprise SEO Tools: The Marketer’s Guide

    Enterprise Web Analytics Tools: The Marketer’s Guide

    Display Ad Clickers Are Not Your Customers

    Top 10 Tips for Optimizing Your Conversion Funnel

    From One-Off Projects to Long-Term Retainers in 6 Easy Steps

    7 Factors to Consider When Choosing a Search Bid Optimization Platform

    21 Social Media Updates & Advancements to Inspire Your 2013 Strategy

    See More Topics

    Search Engine News, SEO & PPC Info

    Recent News at Search Engine Land:

    SearchCap: The Day In Search, February 13, 2013

    Google Hits 67 Percent Market Share Again, Bing Hits Another All-Time High [comScore]

    Panic Flu Searches May Have Tricked Google Flu Trends Into Thinking Things Were Worse

    Search Funnel Data Now More Actionable In AdWords

    How To Use Social Networks To Create Laser-Targeted B2B Advertising Campaigns

    See more at Search Engine Land