Inside Twitter’s Spam Lawsuit: Fighting Five Defendants Cost More Than $700,000

twitter-legal-lawTwitter’s costs in fighting the spam created by five defendants it’s suing are more than $700,000 — and that may be a conservative underestimate. The company is seeking full restitution of those costs and other damages, along with an injunction forcing each defendant to stop its activities, as it seeks a jury trial in a San Francisco federal court.

We wrote yesterday about Twitter’s lawsuit against the five alleged spammers and, now that the filing is available (PDF download), more details are known about Twitter’s case.

Two Types of Defendants

The lawsuit separates the five defendants into two categories:

“Spamware Defendants” are those that, according to the suit, “distribute software tools designed to facilitate abuse of the Twitter platform and marketed to dupe consumers into violating Twitter’s user agreement.” Twitter places TweetAttacks, TweetAdder and TweetBuddy in this group.

“Spammer Defendants” are those that, according to the suit, “operate large numbers of automated Twitter accounts through which they attempt to trick Twitter users into clicking on links to illegitimate websites, again in violation of Twitter’s user agreement.” Twitter identifies defendants James Lucero and Garland E. Harris as being in this group.

Twitter’s Anti-Spam Costs Detailed

The lawsuit goes on to explain that Twitter has “dramatically expanded” its Trust & Safety team in the past year — that’s Twitter anti-spam/anti-fraud group — and that team has responded to “dozens of appeals” from suspended users of the defendants’ products.

Twitter also says that it spent “substantial amounts” of money in the past year fighting spam. The suit details how much Twitter has spent fighting each of the five defendants:

  • “at least $100,000″ spent on anti-spam efforts against Lucero
  • “at least $75,000″ against Harris
  • “at least $75,000″ against TweetAdder
  • “at least $300,000″ against TweetBuddy
  • “at least $150,000″ against TweetAttacks

If those are underestimates — totaling “at least” $700,000 — it’s not unreasonable to think that Twitter’s costs in dealing with these five defendants may have approached a million dollars.

Defendant Details

TweetAttacks: As mentioned in yesterday’s article, TweetAttacks’ website indicates that its software is no longer available. In its lawsuit, Twitter says that happened in late March “in response to actions by Twitter.” The lawsuit also claims that TweetAttacks “continues to support certain customers.”

TweetBuddy: In addition to its complaint against TweetBuddy’s automation software, the lawsuit also claims that TweetBuddy offered Twitter accounts for sale on its website. (That’s a violation of Twitter’s Terms of Service.)

James Lucero: Twitter accuses Lucero — one of the “Spammer Defendants” — of sending out a “high volume of misleading Tweets” that claim to teach the recipient how to get Justin Bieber to follow the recipient’s account; the links in such tweets lead the recipient to Lucero’s “spam websites, which do not deliver the promised information.” Twitter says it has terminated “numerous” accounts that Lucero has used.

Garland E. Harris: Likewise, Twitter’s lawsuit says the company has terminated “numerous accounts” run by Harris. The suit says Harris currently has more than 129,000 “automated spam Twitter accounts” that he uses to spam recipients with links to his websites that offer “online auction and online payment services of questionable legitimacy.”

Lawsuit Details

The lawsuit accuses the defendants of breach of contract, tortious interference with contract, fraud and violating California state business practices.

Twitter is seeking unspecified monetary damages from each defendant (but at a minimum of the costs mentioned above), along with an injunction forcing them to stop what they’re doing.

The lawsuit says the defendants have harmed Twitter by negatively affecting the user experience, damaging users’ goodwill toward Twitter and causing Twitter users to close their accounts due to the amount of spam. It also says the defendants’ actions have caused Twitter to lose existing and prospective business relationships.

As far as we know, no date has been set yet for the case to begin.

(Stock image via Used under license.)

Related Topics: Channel: Social Media Marketing | Features & Analysis | Legal: General | Social Media Marketing: Spam | Twitter: Legal


About The Author: is Editor-In-Chief of Marketing Land. His news career includes time spent in TV, radio, and print journalism. His web career continues to include a small number of SEO and social media consulting clients, as well as regular speaking engagements at marketing events around the U.S. He recently launched a site dedicated to Google Glass called Glass Almanac and also blogs at Small Business Search Marketing. Matt can be found on Twitter at @MattMcGee and/or on Google Plus. You can read Matt's disclosures on his personal blog.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn

Marketing Day:

Get the top marketing stories daily!  


Other ways to share:

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • Anonymous

    Am I alone in finding it a little tragic that these guys obviously have some talent? Shame they couldn’t use it in a different way. 

  • Zachary Reiss-Davis

    Spam on Twitter is such a major problem that I’m frankly glad to see Twitter take any steps it can to work on the problem.  

  • 云 陈

    Each person is different, and the only one.

  • Free Speech

    Trying to eliminate spam is one thing.. but filing a lawsuit against software developers is another. This lawsuit is the wrong solution… but you can file a lawsuit against anyone for any reason. It doesn’t mean you will win the case. Any judge with common sense will recognize that  Twitter (as an open source application) allows  for others in this free country to develop software to work with Twitter (Ex:TweetBuddy, etc…). There is nothing wrong with developing a software that simply allows someone to automate everyday tasks that are a huge waste of time on Twitter. The average user could save several hours per week using this. Also, these companies that have developed software are not the Spammers who abuse the “Twitter Rules”. It is the users of Twitter who spam people.. Therefore, Twitter also enables spam, and anyone who has a Twitter account can spam people.. just like anyone with an email account can spam people. Twitter should be focusing their efforts and money on making Twitter a better service, not blaming some developers for their own lack of creativity to improve their service.

  • Andy Daniels

    TweetAttacks and TweetBuddy are no longer exist. Why TweetAdder is still in business as of May 26, 2012??? 

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Marketing Land on Twitter @marketingland Like Marketing Land on Facebook Follow Marketing Land on Google+ Subscribe to Our Feed! Join our LinkedIn Group Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest


Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States


Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech

Free Daily Marketing News!

Marketing Day is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!