No Data For You: SEO Experts Offer Opinions On Google’s Move To Withhold Even More Search Term Data

google-privacy-200Google quietly confirmed earlier this week that it would be encrypting all search data, regardless of whether a user was signed in or not. The company offered the following statement to clarify their sudden decision to withhold the data:

We added SSL encryption for our signed-in search users in 2011, as well as searches from the Chrome omnibox earlier this year. We’re now working to bring this extra protection to more users who are not signed in.

Marketing Land’s Danny Sullivan wrote about Google’s move to encrypt all non-paid searches, explaining, “The change makes it very likely that in the near future, publishers will receive no search term data sent to them directly through the decades-old and industry-standard ‘referrer’ system.”

In light of Google’s decision to make search term data “100% not provided,” we asked a few of our SEO columnists and other search marketing professionals their opinions on Google’s decision to withhold the data and what marketers should do now.

“This certainly does make things harder on publishers who want to know what types of things are searching on that ends up bringing them to their site,” said Stone Temple’s founder and CEO Eric Enge, “This is pretty basic information that they can use to better understand whether or not the content they are providing on the pages of their site matches up well with the incoming search queries.”

Enge points out that the search data is available via Google’s Webmaster Tools, but pulling the information can be cumbersome. “You can get that data, but only by clicking on the search term,” said Enge, “When you do, you get a screen like this (see image below). Pulling this data across thousands of terms is clearly not going to happen.”

search query data graph Eric Enge

Enge offered a number of solutions for finding keyword data, including Google Suggest and YouTube Suggest to see common variants of search queries, PPC tools like SEMRush and SpyFu (“This will be PPC-based data, but should be good,” said Enge), and Bing’s keyword tool, along with other keyword tools like WordTracker and Keyword Discovery.

“Monday was the day keywords died,” said LunaMetrics SEO project manager Reid Bandremer. “This is a huge challenge, but it’s also a great opportunity for top agencies to differentiate themselves from those who can’t adapt.”

After hearing the news, Bandremer said his company held a brainstorming session that included team members from LunaMetrics PPC and Google Analytics departments. The SEO project manager offered the following advice culled from his company’s brainstorming session:

First, SEO practitioners need to frame their problem. They need to pin down the gaps in actionable insight they need to fill: What are the decisions you and your clients make that rely on keyword data? What specific metrics and reports do you use to come up with the insights required to make said decisions?

The second thing to do is brainstorm solutions. For example, we came up with eight possible ways to estimate the ratio of non-branded to total organic search traffic.

The third thing to do is vet the solutions. It seems that there are three factors that make a solution to problems caused by “100% not provided” viable: 1.) the problems it resolves, 2.) data accuracy, and 3.) scalability and practicality.

There’s a fourth step in overcoming “100% not provided”. That would be continuous improvement. We need to keep checking our methods, keep reading the industry literature and keep looking out for better ideas. The problem is too big to tackle alone.

As the director of Web marketing for 352 Media Group, Erin Everhart was shocked. “It was alarming,” said Everhart, “But, it’s really not that bad. We knew this day was coming.”

According to Everhart, marketers need to be more analytical in what they are measuring, and pay more attention to KPI’s like page level metrics, traffic sources and breakdowns by campaigns. “All of these things actually show us way more about how our website is performing than keyword data,” said Everhart, “Clients are the ones typically demanding keyword data and rankings, so it’s our responsibility to educate them.”

Everheart says that her company has been preparing clients for these changes.

“It’s definitely annoying it popped up all of a sudden, and that you can still get keyword data if you pay for it,” said Everhart, “You can’t claim it’s for users’ privacy if you’re turning around and selling that data to the highest, or any, bidder.”

Other SEO professionals are questioning Google’s motives as well.

“In terms of the suddenness of the decision,” said SEO firm Conductor’s director of research Nathan Safran, “I can only speculate that it’s about wanting to appear protective of the user.”

Referencing the recent Prism scandal where Google was accused of giving data to the NSA, Safran questions Google’s intentions to withhold the data, “How they did not anticipate how that would appear, given their willingness to pass keyword data in paid search, truly baffles me.”

For marketers, Safran’s agency is encouraging companies to look at the broader picture when it comes to keywords:

We think it means they [marketers] need to shift from being purely keyword focused to being more content focused, measuring how content is resonating rather than strictly how keywords are performing. Measuring search visibility actually becomes more important as a top of the funnel measurement since keyword traffic data is now gone.

The Link Building Company owner Julie Joyce was not rattled by the news. “I can honestly say that Google’s decision to do this doesn’t have a huge effect on how I work,” said Joyce, “I’m much more concerned with looking at which sites send referring traffic through the links I’ve built, for example, than I am on which keywords bring users to the site.”

Joyce admits she uses keyword data, but simply doesn’t rely on it. Still, while she wasn’t surprised by the decision, she was puzzled by how quickly the change was made.

“The suddenness of the switch did throw me a bit as I knew it was coming, but was definitely surprised to see it happen so quickly, but, in the end, it’s their product so I suppose it’s their right.”

Like Everhart, Joyce recommends that marketers consider a new metric, or KPI, to suit their purposes. She suggests using Google’s Webmaster Tools or possibly running a small Adwords campaign if necessary, “I hate to advise people to spend money to get something that they used to get for free,” said Joyce, “If that’s how it’s going to be, I think it’s better to accept it and deal with it than it is to stay stressed and complain about it for ages.”

Here is a collection of insights from SEO professionals who tweeted their responses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Related Topics: Analytics | Channel: Search Marketing | Google: Analytics | Google: Privacy | Google: SEO | Search Marketing | Top News

Sponsored


About The Author: is Third Door Media's General Assignment Correspondent, and reports on the latest news and updates for Marketing Land and Search Engine Land. From 2009 to 2012, she was an award-winning syndicated columnist for a number of daily newspapers from New York to Texas. With more than ten years of marketing management experience, she has contributed to a variety of traditional and online publications, including MarketingProfs.com, SoftwareCEO.com, and Sales and Marketing Management Magazine. Read more of Amy's articles.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn



Marketing Day:

Get the top marketing stories daily!  

Share

Other ways to share:
 

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • jack hunt

    Thank you for writing and formatting this article so well. It has really given my brain a boost. I agree with much of this info.

  • Pixelrage

    Now is as good a time as ever to run a business that has a strong local presence and does not rely on surviving solely off of Google. Google can and will do whatever it wants, and this is another nail in the coffin for businesses that rely so heavily on internet traffic as their main source.

  • Reid Bandremer

    Respectfully, I must disagree that this is a “nail in the coffin”. The total amount of internet traffic has not decreased. Nor has the total amount of search engine traffic. If you’re doing the right things as a marketer and a brand, you’ll still get just as much Google traffic as before. All this does is make it more difficult to attain certain insights.

    I mean, we still have more data than offline marketers. And look how much companies still shell out for Superbowl ads.

  • C Jones

    Google has made two major announcements (including “Hummingbird”). It will be interesting to see just how relevant the Google search results remain in the future. Hopefully Bing, and others won’t follow suit because providing keyword data to SEOr’s could have a very positive impact on their ability to provide more relevant listings and also attract new users.

  • http://www.CheesyCorporateLingo.com/ Patrick Reinhart

    All SEO’s that completely rely on keyword data these days should not be offering their services to anyone. SEO is about so much more than that and people need to look at the bigger picture of a site and not just 15 keywords that drive some traffic.

  • http://webdesign.ducktoes.com/seo.php Cathie of Ducktoes SEO

    I have other tools to find out keywords etc. Majestic SEO and ahrefs. Will they stop working, do you think? Are they reliant on Google for their information?

  • http://www.boostedseo.com/ Andrew Mucci

    100% agree

  • RedLeader

    Majestic is not a keyword tool, it is a link tool. I don’t even think there’s a basic keyword generation function in the tool set, or if there is, they’ve hidden it well. This: http://blog.majesticseo.com/development/keywords-provided-majestic-seo/ is *not* a keyword tool in the way Analytics was – it’s a keyword generation tool, like the AdWords Keyword Tool and many others.

    More to the point however, the issue isn’t about *generating* lists of keywords, it’s about knowing which keywords are sending traffic to your sites. Using tools to generate keywords is a wholly different function in SEO, and that area still works, but is irrelevant to the issue at hand – that we can no longer see which keywords were sending traffic to our site.

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Marketing Land on Twitter @marketingland Like Marketing Land on Facebook Follow Marketing Land on Google+ Subscribe to Our Feed! Join our LinkedIn Group Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest

 
 

Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States

Europe

Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech


Free Daily Marketing News!

Marketing Day is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!