Pay-Per-Gaze Advertising: New Google Patent May Reveal Plans For Monetizing Google Glass

google-glass-logo-200pxGoogle has been granted a patent that appears to reveal some far-reaching plans for the eye-tracking sensor that exists — but currently isn’t formally used — on Google Glass.

And if you think those plans must include some form of advertising, you’d be correct.

In the patent, Google is calling it “pay-per-gaze” advertising, and it involves charging advertisers if the user looks at an ad — online or offline — while wearing Glass.

To be clear, the patent — which was filed in May 2011 and granted on Tuesday — doesn’t specifically mention Google Glass by name, and the application includes images that look more like traditional two-lens glasses than Google Glass:


But it does refer to “eyeglasses” that have “side-arms that engage ears of the user” and lenses with “at least one forward facing scene camera disposed on the eyeglasses.” Those descriptions fit the current incarnation of Google Glass. And keep in mind that some early prototypes of Glass did sport a standard dual-lens design.

Google’s Gaze-Tracking Patent

The patent specifically covers a gaze-tracking technique that uses an eye-tracking sensor to determine what the wearer is looking at. But what’s interesting is what Google says that it might do with a gaze-tracking system in place:

Charge Companies If Users Look At An Ad

The patent includes a claim that Google could try to charge companies if the wearer happens to see an ad while wearing the device:

… determining which, if any, of the identified items within the external scenes viewed by the user are advertisements; and charging advertisers associated with the advertisements based at least in part on a per gaze basis.

The patent calls it pay-per-gaze advertising. And it doesn’t matter if the user sees an ad online or offline.

Pay per gaze advertising need not be limited to on-line advertisements, but rather can be extended to conventional advertisement media including billboards, magazines, newspapers, and other forms of conventional print media. Thus, the gaze tracking system described herein offers a mechanism to track and bill offline advertisements in the manner similar to popular online advertisement schemes.

Advertisers could be charged based on whether the user looked directly at the ad and, if so, for how long. The patent also says Google could collect (and charge advertisers for) analytical data such as how long an ad held the user’s gaze and what emotional response it generated. Emotional response would be determined, in part, on the user’s pupil dilation while looking at the ad.

Yes, it’s creepy. It’s outlandish. And it’s pure Google.

About those analytics, the patent says that “personal identifying data may be removed from the data and provided to the advertisers as anonymous analytics” and users may have opt-in/opt-out privileges to control what, when and how data is being gathered.

Provide Automatic, Augmented Search Results

The patent also includes a form of augmented reality, where “search results” would be shown to the user based on what s/he’s looking at — without the user ever having to even speak a query.


The patent calls this “latent pre-searching.”

… latent pre-searching can improve visual searching to identify an item by triggering the visual search when it first enters the user’s peripheral view before it reaches his direct gaze and speed up potential informational searches on identified items submitted by the user. In one embodiment, once a latent pre-search has identified a particular item, the informational search may also be automatically triggered as a latent pre-search and the informational results also queued for quick, on-demand user retrieval.

These visual searches would be stored in a “gazing log” and the user would be able to go back and see all the things s/he viewed in this personal viewing history.

Final Thoughts

This is probably a good time to mention that just because Google (or any company) is granted a patent, it’s no guarantee that the patent will ever be used.

Nonetheless, this one offers an interesting (and kinda creepy) look at how Google might use the eye-tracking sensor on Glass in the future.

(tip via Fast Company / second image created with

Postscript, April 19: For more on this story, please see a new article: Google: We Have No Plans To Use Pay-Per-Gaze Advertising Patent.

Related Topics: Channel: Mobile Marketing | Features & Analysis | Google: Glass | Mobile Marketing | Top News


About The Author: is Editor-In-Chief of Marketing Land. His news career includes time spent in TV, radio, and print journalism. His web career continues to include a small number of SEO and social media consulting clients, as well as regular speaking engagements at marketing events around the U.S. He recently launched a site dedicated to Google Glass called Glass Almanac and also blogs at Small Business Search Marketing. Matt can be found on Twitter at @MattMcGee and/or on Google Plus. You can read Matt's disclosures on his personal blog.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn

Marketing Day:

Get the top marketing stories daily!  


Other ways to share:

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • majgr

    It is not for print. Ads will be displayed as augmentations, in context where user is, and what he is looking at. At that point ads make perfect sense, and time of eye fixation means engagement. Here is extended version of this idea: user walks on the street, sees augmented ad, decides to enter the store, there glasses are detected, and store owner is charged for ad + action.

    In some time Google Glass would be as a free subscription. User will be charged only when he/she do not use it.

  • SardoNardo

    I kinda like where that is heading.

  • Paul Bouzide

    “When the product is free, you are the product”

  • majgr

    Well, Google has millions of walking “products” already. Price is high, since, this kind of advertising uses user all data + time, location context. Also it can be used for TV, if glasses can play it. It all means Google could own whole advertising market.

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Marketing Land on Twitter @marketingland Like Marketing Land on Facebook Follow Marketing Land on Google+ Subscribe to Our Feed! Join our LinkedIn Group Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest


Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States


Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech

Free Daily Marketing News!

Marketing Day is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!