People Now Spend More Time With “Mobile” Than Print Mags, Newspapers Combined

According to an eMarketer analysis of time spent with media, TV and mobile saw significant gains vs. 2010 — with conventional TV the winner and still champion. According to the data presented, the average US adult spends about 4 hours and 34 minutes per day watching TV. Multitasking is counted as time spent independently with each medium.

(Here are some gratuitous but related, facts: Almost one in three Americans are technically obese, while one in 20 are clinically depressed according to the US Center for Disease Control. Excessive TV watching is partly a reaction to stress and/or depression and leads in part to obesity.)

Time spent with the internet was up almost 8 percentage points over last year. But time spent with mobile devices increased 30 percent. No doubt that’s partly a statement about the growth of smartphones. But here’s the headline: “US adults now spend more time with their mobile phones than with print magazines and newspapers combined, at 1 hour and 5 minutes vs. just 44 minutes,” according to eMarketer.

Comparing time spent with mobile to print is a bit of “apples to oranges,” because all time spent on mobile devices isn’t looking at media. There’s a much broader array of things that people do on smartphones (call, text, internet, apps/games, etc.). A somewhat better comparison would be time spent with comparable content on mobile devices vs. print. It’s also not clear how/whether tablets are factored in to this analysis; they don’t appear to be.

Data from multiple sources indicate that the majority of tablet owners spend more than an hour a day “consuming content” on their mostly iPads. According to survey data from Google-AdMob 43 percent of respondents reported using their tablets more than other devices/media:

Source: Google-AdMob (3/11), n=1,430

In addition, more recent research from Google says, “tablets are multi-tasking devices with at least 42 percent of activities occurring while doing another task or engaging with another entertainment medium” (often TV).

The “time spent” metric is instructive for marketers but, as I’ve suggested, a bit deceiving. We’re now firmly in a multitasking world where one must assume that other media and devices are being used and consumed simultaneously (i.e., smartphones, tablets). And that’s especially true in the case of TV. So while people spend the most time with TV, are they actually paying attention to the ads?

Advertising must now shift to reflect and take advantage of this real-time “cross-platform” reality.

Postscript: I was in contact with eMarketer and told that “mobile” does include tablets in this data.

Related Topics: Channel: Mobile Marketing | Mobile Marketing | Statistics: Mobile Marketing | Statistics: Online Behavior | Top News


About The Author: is a Contributing Editor at Search Engine Land. He writes a personal blog Screenwerk, about SoLoMo issues and connecting the dots between online and offline. He also posts at Internet2Go, which is focused on the mobile Internet. Follow him @gsterling.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn

Marketing Day:

Get the top marketing stories daily!  


Other ways to share:

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • Agam Panwar

    Again a nicely built post Gerg. I am becoming a big fan of yours every day :)

    - Agam Panwar
    Blue Sapphire Creations – Your Digital Marketing Agency!

  • Boris Krumov

    This is only pushing [print] media into innovative ways around the situation towards better and more digital quality content. And I don’t speak out of repeating what the market trends say, it is out of experience – I work with print media.

  • Andrew Skelly

    I’m amazed advertisers are still paying top dollar for news print advertising.

  • Carlos Chacón l SEO

    Great data! Someday the companies will realize the newspaper is wasting money… comparing with online ads. They still believing people spend time reading the news on paper… Even if that is true, they are just reading; not buying or taking decisions. 
    Online advertising rocks because it is a unique “momentum” when customers are looking for something! Print advertising is going to died… sooner or later. It is expensive and it has been doing the same for the last 100 years. 

    Thanks for sharing this data!

  • Jordi Rosell


  • Jordi Rosell


  • Robert Lindsey

    I definitely wouldn’t want to be selling print ads right now. QR codes may help but I think the print medium is collapsing quickly.    Services like are going to make things even worse for them

  • Anonymous

    Very interesting ! Keeping up with consumers changing “media consumption”  patterns results in more effective communication strategies .

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Marketing Land on Twitter @marketingland Like Marketing Land on Facebook Follow Marketing Land on Google+ Subscribe to Our Feed! Join our LinkedIn Group Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest


Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States


Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech

Free Daily Marketing News!

Marketing Day is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!