Twitter Loses French Appeal To Avoid Disclosing Hate-Speaker Names

twitter-legal-lawTwitter has lost an appeal in France to avoid disclosing the identities of people behind anti-Semitic hashtags that appeared and trended last year. Among them were #unjuifmort, which translates “a dead Jew,” and “unbonjuif” (“a good Jew”), which became a source of jokes about The Holocaust and killing Jews.

Anti-Semitism is currently on the rise throughout Europe.

The Union of Jewish French Students (UEJF) and other human-rights groups sought disclosure of the identities of those behind the hashtags. Twitter refused, though it removed some of the more outrageous content.

In January, a civil court in France ordered Twitter to disclose the identities behind the hashtags. Twitter largely ignored the ruling. The company argued it was following US law, which allows offensive speech under the First Amendment. However, France has much more restrictive rules around racist and hate speech.

The UEJF then sued Twitter for $50 million seeking to force Twitter to comply with the French ruling and to publicize the company’s refusal. Twitter appealed the lower-court ruling and this week lost its bid to withhold the names. According to a French-government spokesperson (via The Verge):

“We have made important progress with Twitter since December,” government spokesperson Najat Vallaud-Belkacem said in a statement Wednesday. “Anti-discrimination organizations can intervene to stop the avalanche of hate speech that regularly floods the internet, but the illegal messages posted on Twitter remain no less illegal, and adhering to French law is not optional.”

“Twitter must comply with legal orders to allow the identification, and therefore the conviction, of the authors of these hateful tweets,” Vallaud-Belkacem continued.

This is yet another legal cast involving the Internet, where an international conflict of laws is on display. As Twitter correctly argued, much of the content posted under the anti-Semitic hashtags would be allowed in the US under the First Amendment. However, Twitter cannot use that as legal justification in France for withholding the information.

Twitter said it may again try to appeal. It’s doubtful, however, that the company will succeed.

Related Topics: Channel: Social Media Marketing | Legal: Censorship | Legal: General | Top News | Twitter | Twitter: Legal


About The Author: is a Contributing Editor at Search Engine Land. He writes a personal blog Screenwerk, about SoLoMo issues and connecting the dots between online and offline. He also posts at Internet2Go, which is focused on the mobile Internet. Follow him @gsterling.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn

Marketing Day:

Get the top marketing stories daily!  


Other ways to share:

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. You can read more about our comments policy here.

Comments are closed.

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Marketing Land on Twitter @marketingland Like Marketing Land on Facebook Follow Marketing Land on Google+ Subscribe to Our Feed! Join our LinkedIn Group Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest


Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States


Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech

Free Daily Marketing News!

Marketing Day is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!