What’s The Most Expensive (Per User) Acquisition? Hint: Not WhatsApp
Last week when Facebook made its jaw-dropping $19 billion announcement that it was buying messenger WhatsApp many people, including me, marveled at the astonishing figure. But almost immediately others said, “Facebook got a deal; WhatsApp was actually cheap.”
I certainly wouldn’t go that far but by some measures WhatsApp (even at $19 billion) is not the most expensive startup acquisition in memory. If one considers the price per user, WhatsApp does emerge as a relative bargain.
This morning, I was pointed to a chart, based on public/third party data, created by Brightside that compares acquisitions on a per-user valuation. This is one of several such comparisons I’ve seen in the wake of the WhatsApp announcement.
The chart is too large to fully include but below, I’ve captured a few of the more prominent acquisitions and their per-user prices:
- GeoCities (by Yahoo): $830.23
- Aardvark (by Google) $555.56
- Mapquest (by AOL): $297.30
- Jaiku (by Google): $240
- Feedburner (by Google): $232.56
- Zappos (by Amazon): $206.22
- Delicious (by Yahoo): $150
- Flickr (by Yahoo): $111.11
- WhatsApp (by Facebook): $35.56
- Instagram (by Facebook): $28.57
What’s interesting about the list above is that many of the services are shuttered, suggesting that the acquisitions and their high per-user costs may have been wasted. Indeed, the now-defunct GeoCities property was the most expensive according to the data reflected on the Brightside graphic.
What’s your reaction? Do you believe that WhatsApp is a bargain on a per-user basis vs. the others, and is that the right metric to evaluate the deal?
(Some images used under license from Shutterstock.com.)
Discover what's up in the business of marketing each Friday.