Why The New Facebook Hashtags Are #Awkward & #Unnecessary

Today to the delight of many marketers Facebook announced the release of hashtags. The new clickable links will pop open a new stream with public updates around each specific term. While hashtags seem like a great idea, there are quite a few obstacles in the way of #success for this new feature.

Why Not Search?

While hashtags work well for simple social sites like Twitter (140 characters) or Instagram (a photo with little to no text,) they come off as unwarranted on a site that includes in-depth Open Graph Search like Facebook. Facebook is far and away the most sophisticated social networking site … and it’s not even close. The power that Facebook has is in leveraging the overwhelming data, connections and interests that users input. Instead of forcing users to classify what a specific post is about, Facebook could piggyback off of Graph Search and build out their search to include updates, the highest shared links on a topic, or even an interests page around specific items.


The requirement of the hashtag goes against the notion of Graph Search. Why not just let me see who’s talking about a topic by tossing into the main search bar and choose to view by friends/public/page. Facebook is one of the only networks who didn’t require the usage of hashtags, but went the route anyway.

Privacy Hinders Effectiveness

The biggest concern that I have with hashtags on Facebook is privacy. Not a concern in privacy leaks, rather that there may be to much. The majority of Twitter users are public – not the case with Facebook. If i’m looking to see a real-time accurate conversation about a specific topic, having more data is valuable.


Simply put, Twitter has a much higher percentage of  updates on any given topic. With the privacy of Facebook posts, I know that I would not trust Facebook hashtags as the premier source of unfiltered discussion on a topic.

Hashtags Are Anti-Facebook Page

Another advantage that Facebook has is that brand pages are rich, robust and can act like a website for many. When you head to a specific topic page (like the NBA) fan discussions can be seen. Unlike Twitter, conversations and reactions can be viewed on a specific page. Now users will be required to utilize both hashtags and tagging to tie in brands.


Instead of bringing in brands and pages, the conversations will be on separate hashtag streams.

They Are Inferior

Right now, the hashtag search is far inferior to Twitter search. Alright, alright – it’s only the first day, but gaining adoption is key. Right now, the hashtags simply act as a stream, rather than helping users find top content within a tag.


Updates in different languages, empty-unliked posts are all currently showing. Poor results will breed poor adoption.

Page Domination

Get ready for an influx of brands and Pages in the hashtag results. In stark contrast to profiles, pages are intrinsically public. Due to the privacy issues on posts, Pages will have a big opening to capture hashtag traffic.


In the majority of hashtag searches performed, Pages where a staple in the results – great for brands, questionably helpful and somewhat awkward for users.

While Facebook hashtags are noteworthy, they currently have a long way to go to become a valuable tool for Facebook users. #Sorry Facebook, but i’ll be keeping my public conversations on Twitter.

Related Topics: Channel | Channel: Social Media Marketing | Facebook | Facebook: Marketing | Features & Analysis | Social Media Marketing: Hashtags


About The Author: is the Director of Marketing for Cypress North, a company that specializes in social media and search marketing services and web-based application development. He has been in the Internet marketing industry for 6+ years and specializes in Social Media Marketing. You can also find Greg on Twitter (@gregfinn) or LinkedIn.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn

Marketing Day:

Get the top marketing stories daily!  


Other ways to share:

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • Harry Hawk

    Yes it forks the user experience on Facebook… and brands will take advantage. But, so will fans and friends. #hashtags allow anyone and everyone to create ad hoc discussions and to disrupt them as well. I view this as a win for everyone. That Facebook is enabling it I see as a sign of strength and maturity.

    If the UX/UI of Facebook stagnates so does the experience… So far I’m impressed and the fans of http://Facebook.com/Leskesbakery are enjoying it as well. For some, its totally new and that reinforces my belief Fb was correct to enable #hashtagsOnFacebook

  • Ahmed Khalifa

    I have a feeling that this will increase the level of spamming and unreadable sentences.

  • http://www.LeadDiscovery.com/ Jerry Nordstrom

    Green eggs and #spam -

  • http://www.spinxdigital.com/ Stephen Moyers

    I think it’s good and helpful up to certain extent but I do agree that it may increases level of spamming.

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Marketing Land on Twitter @marketingland Like Marketing Land on Facebook Follow Marketing Land on Google+ Subscribe to Our Feed! Join our LinkedIn Group Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest


Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States


Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech

Free Daily Marketing News!

Marketing Day is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!