Get the most important digital marketing news each day.

Note: By submitting this form, you agree to Third Door Media's terms. We respect your privacy.

Facebook outlines its advertising principles to show it has them

After being criticized for the ways its ad platform can be misused, Facebook has responded by listing the principles governing its use.

Tim Peterson on November 27, 2017 at 2:05 pm

Over the past year, Facebook’s advertising business has been derided for many reasons. For being used by Russian entities to attempt to sway last year’s US presidential election. For enabling discrimination against minorities, a violation of federal housing law. For offering ways to target ads to self-identified members of hate groups. And then there are the myriad measurements errors the company has disclosed.

After all the light shed on the dark side of Facebook’s ad business, the company is trying to shift the spotlight to the bright side, countering the examples of how its platform can and has been misused with an itemized list of how the company governs its use.

In a company blog post published on Monday, Facebook’s VP of ad products, Rob Goldman, laid out the social network’s advertising principles. “While the world and our services are always evolving, we thought it would be helpful to lay out the principles that guide our decision-making when it comes to advertising across Facebook, Messenger and Instagram,” Goldman wrote.

Facebook’s advertising principles include protecting people’s personal information, being transparent about the ads running across its properties and upholding its community standards with advertisers. There are also inclusions preaching Facebook’s people-first ethos, positioning its platform as empowering smaller businesses and emphasizing that everything is a work in progress.

If all of that sounds familiar, it should. The principles themselves are nothing new for Facebook. The company is simply putting a bow on them. What impact compiling these principles into a single blog post will have is unclear. At the least, it gives Facebook’s executives something to point to the next time they are called before Congress and lambasted for negligently operating a platform that can be used to seemingly any end, including to undermine democracy.

Opinions expressed in this article are those of the guest author and not necessarily Marketing Land. Staff authors are listed here.

About The Author

Tim Peterson

Tim Peterson, Third Door Media's Social Media Reporter, has been covering the digital marketing industry since 2011. He has reported for Advertising Age, Adweek and Direct Marketing News. A born-and-raised Angeleno who graduated from New York University, he currently lives in Los Angeles.He has broken stories on Snapchat's ad plans, Hulu founding CEO Jason Kilar's attempt to take on YouTube and the assemblage of Amazon's ad-tech stack; analyzed YouTube's programming strategy, Facebook's ad-tech ambitions and ad blocking's rise; and documented digital video's biggest annual event VidCon, BuzzFeed's branded video production process and Snapchat Discover's ad load six months after launch. He has also developed tools to monitor brands' early adoption of live-streaming apps, compare Yahoo's and Google's search designs and examine the NFL's YouTube and Facebook video strategies.