Influencers vs. thought leaders and the rise of image analytics

Let’s start with a question: Are influencers and thought leaders the same? I’ve found myself thinking about this quite a bit recently, and the easiest answer I can provide is “no.” They’re different — and this wasn’t always the case.

Whenever a new medium has emerged, certain people have always risen above the masses with uniquely suited methods and ideas to get the most impact for their efforts in that medium. As the prevalence of technology and social networks grew, we created equally uncreative names to call these new-media unicorns.

First were the early adopters, or “adapters” for those who really didn’t get it. Then, we saw the rise of the “mavens” and “gurus.” Currently, we are surrounded by the “thought leaders” and “influencers” — but the titles are no longer interchangeably appropriate.

The divergence of influencers and thought leaders

The split between these two — at one time synonymous — online personas developed with the rise and competition of new social sites. These smaller niche platforms didn’t attempt to supplant the massive social sites; rather, they simply tried to carve out their own submarket in the social media landscape — even if it was small.

This is when influencers and thought leaders quietly diverged from one another. And from this split came the need for visual analytics, even if marketers and consumer intelligence professionals didn’t realize it immediately.

Much like the actual wild, you can find thought leaders on sites like LinkedIn and Twitter. Thought leaders write blogs, contribute to forums and have columns on news sites. This is their habitat and where they are most comfortable and effective.

Conversely, influencers are more visual and attention-seeking. You’ll see them on platforms like Instagram and Snapchat. Thought leaders spread their message outward, whereas influencers invite you in so that you can bear witness to their lives. This is why influencers are prime resources for brand sponsorships and endorsements.

Most social platforms, even those favored by thought leaders, work toward being influencer-friendly. There are two reasons for this: Social content that includes an image or video is better at getting attention and engagement online. And secondly, advertising dollars flow to — and through — influencers.

A thought leader’s audience makes decisions. An influencer’s audience spends money. Thought leaders will get compensated for delivering keynotes, and influencers get paid to be present and relevant. A perfect example of this is Fyre Festival. Thousands of people flocked to an island because they saw pictures on carefully selected influencer social channels. With this type of power, and the corresponding money, image insights are a necessity.

Technology meets expectation

Marketers and researchers have discussed the practice of logo tracking for a while, but the technology is finally catching up to expectations. Unlike keyword and conversational tracking, logos and images may appear within social posts that make no mention of the brand, logo, sponsorship or endorsement.

[Read the full article on MarTech Today.]

Opinions expressed in this article are those of the guest author and not necessarily Marketing Land. Staff authors are listed here.

About The Author

Will McInnes

Will McInnes is CMO of social intelligence platform Brandwatch. His passion is social data and how it can shape industries, policies, research and innovation. He's also a board member of the Big Boulder Initiative, whose mission is to establish the foundation for the long-term success of the social data industry. Previously Will co-founded and ran NixonMcInnes, a consultancy which pioneered in early social media marketing and went on to change how more than 30 major corporations, charities and governmental departments behave, particularly in response to social and digital. He authored Culture Shock, a 21st-century handbook for business with an average review of 4.5 stars on Amazon and was a TEDx speaker in 2011.