Report: Mobile Display Ads Outperformed Search In Delivering New Customer Calls
Nearly half of search-generated calls were from existing customers.
A fascinating new report from Marchex analyzed 1.8 million calls to compare the performance of different mobile ad channels in driving new sales prospects in the Financial Services and Insurance categories. The ad channels examined were directories, search engines, Marchex’s “voice search” network and mobile display ads.
The uniform objective of the ads across channels was to generate new sales calls rather than clicks or form fills. Marchex uses an IVR disambiguation system to separate genuine prospects from customer service calls and others (i.e., “press 2”).
Some of the calls were fielded by national call centers and some by local agents. The data were collected and analyzed in 2014.
In the aggregate, combining all four channels, Marchex found that 31 percent of calls were from new sales prospects. Otherwise, 69 percent were unintended calls, existing customers, telemarketers or repeat calls. This is sobering information for all those who believe that all calls are equally “good leads.”
Below is the relative performance — percentage of calls that self-identified as new sales prospects — of each of the channels examined:
- Search engines (Google, et al) — 32 percent
- Voice search network (Marchex network of third party sites) — 35 percent
- Directories (e.g., Yelp, Angie’s List, YP) — 11 percent
- Mobile display — 37 percent
Interestingly, of the four channels, search engines had the highest percentage of calls (48 percent) from existing customers. Mobile display had the least number of calls (10 percent) from existing customers, which makes sense. Directories suffered because telemarketers mine them heavily to sell to business owners. Indeed half of the calls generated directory sites, in the study, were considered “spam and misdials.”
In terms of mobile devices, the iPhone was responsible for 2X the call traffic of Android phones according to the report. This potentially reflects demographic and income differences in terms of smartphone ownership and those in the market for insurance or financial services.
The research did not consider the relative cost of the different channels nor analyze actual “closes” by channel. So we don’t know which of the four was most “efficient” from those perspectives. However the idea that mobile display ads beat search in generating new sales prospects is certainly a surprise.